|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 12, 2024 13:00:00 GMT -8
A man known for his mid-range but can’t shoot here ok Pau gasol career 1.4 blocks a game doesn’t blocks Tyson career 1.1 blocks a game is Ben 2.0 you knew that stuff when you drafted smh Pau Gasol PF 7'0'' 250 21 B- C C C+ B- A Good strength. Solid inside scoring, defensive rebounding and jumpshot. Mediocre blocks, steals, and handles. Tyson Chandler C 7'0'' 235 19 C C- C- B- B A Good strength. Solid blocks, offensive rebounding, post defense, and defensive rebounding. Mediocre handles. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 12, 2024 15:04:06 GMT -8
A man known for his mid-range but can’t shoot here ok Pau gasol career 1.4 blocks a game doesn’t blocks Tyson career 1.1 blocks a game is Ben 2.0 Pau at 1.0 in 30 MPG as a 21YO rookie will definitely surpass 1.4 per game. Chandler was supposed to be made better to fill the draft class. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 12, 2024 15:04:57 GMT -8
Pau gasol career 1.4 blocks a game doesn’t blocks Tyson career 1.1 blocks a game is Ben 2.0 you knew that stuff when you drafted smh Pau Gasol PF 7'0'' 250 21 B- C C C+ B- A Good strength. Solid inside scoring, defensive rebounding and jumpshot. Mediocre blocks, steals, and handles. Tyson Chandler C 7'0'' 235 19 C C- C- B- B A Good strength. Solid blocks, offensive rebounding, post defense, and defensive rebounding. Mediocre handles. Ya, I mean the notes are pretty transparent. With potential and camps if we dont want inflation, we need to have lower ratings. Whats the over under on Amare being a 75% FT shooter eventually? |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 12, 2024 15:10:35 GMT -8
I expect complaints with the newer lower ratings. But this is it fellas.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 12, 2024 15:13:44 GMT -8
you knew that stuff when you drafted smh Pau Gasol PF 7'0'' 250 21 B- C C C+ B- A Good strength. Solid inside scoring, defensive rebounding and jumpshot. Mediocre blocks, steals, and handles. Tyson Chandler C 7'0'' 235 19 C C- C- B- B A Good strength. Solid blocks, offensive rebounding, post defense, and defensive rebounding. Mediocre handles. Ya, I mean the notes are pretty transparent. With potential and camps if we dont want inflation, we need to have lower ratings. Whats the over under on Amare being a 75% FT shooter eventually? bigs that low really dont develop a jump shot, and he is made extremely flawed, a big that cant block, cant rebound, cant shoot the jumper really has no value. You cant miss all three of those things, and there is 0 guarantee any of those develop. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 12, 2024 15:14:24 GMT -8
Amare with a good jump shot is an interesting player, and worthy of a high pick, but Amare with mediocre jump shot? nah
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 12, 2024 15:15:36 GMT -8
the fact that Amare cant play SF means you can be a little more loose with those ratings, not more tight, just makes him useless.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 12, 2024 15:15:58 GMT -8
We will see.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 12, 2024 15:17:24 GMT -8
The issue isnt that he cant develop, but a guy who really is a top 2-3 talent being made to where he has to develop a jump shot, blocks, and rebounds in some combo of 2-3 to be playable (and rebounds probably just required entirely) is a bad gamble for anybody. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 12, 2024 15:19:15 GMT -8
like, Amare has no good thing, because of the jump shot he isnt a good scorer, he doesnt defend well, and he doesnt rebound well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Respected GM on Mar 12, 2024 16:43:46 GMT -8
Amare is the highest C- in the draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by Respected GM on Mar 12, 2024 16:43:53 GMT -8
Outside rating
|
|
|
|
Post by Respected GM on Mar 12, 2024 16:44:57 GMT -8
He's also the second highest C rated rebounder.
|
|
|
|
Post by Respected GM on Mar 12, 2024 16:46:33 GMT -8
So if you camp him off the bat with jumpshot and rebounding he already goes into that first TC A- C C- C+ C+ A with what I would assume to be a lot of POT.
|
|
|
|
Post by Respected GM on Mar 12, 2024 16:47:30 GMT -8
I have seen Al Harrington in one BBS grow a whole letter grade in one TC.
|
|
CC
New Member
Golden State Warriors
Posts: 37,259
|
Post by CC on Mar 12, 2024 17:23:21 GMT -8
Jamal Sampson a lottery pick
|
|
|
|
Post by lumley316 on Mar 12, 2024 18:50:02 GMT -8
Jamal Sampson a lottery pick Was that one of jahs boys who got mad pot boost last bbs |
|
|
|
Post by quicky on Mar 12, 2024 19:02:10 GMT -8
Can we go back to old league
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Mar 12, 2024 19:20:46 GMT -8
So if you camp him off the bat with jumpshot and rebounding he already goes into that first TC A- C C- C+ C+ A with what I would assume to be a lot of POT. Yea that’s the problem, both his rebounding and jump shot NEED camping so you to sacrifice his shot blocking ever being any good |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Mar 12, 2024 20:37:12 GMT -8
Amare is the highest C- in the draft. But mediocre means 50-55 jump shot, he just has a three |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 14, 2024 8:32:25 GMT -8
Questions?
|
|
|
|
Post by chipper on Mar 14, 2024 8:39:49 GMT -8
It's ironic that some people that said ratings were out of control in the least league are now like "we need to inflate ratings!"
(Also, I'm playing devil's advocate, as I also think ratings should be higher from the jump but that's just me)
|
|
|
|
Post by chipper on Mar 14, 2024 8:40:52 GMT -8
Smush Parker PG 6'4'' 190 23 C+ C C+ B- C- B
think his notes were forgotten
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 14, 2024 8:43:24 GMT -8
It's ironic that some people that said ratings were out of control in the least league are now like "we need to inflate ratings!" (Also, I'm playing devil's advocate, as I also think ratings should be higher from the jump but that's just me) The only real consistent thing is a large contingent of Gms being unhappy about some aspect. Is what it is. Im just gonna do what I think is best. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 14, 2024 8:44:17 GMT -8
Smush Parker PG 6'4'' 190 23 C+ C C+ B- C- B think his notes were forgotten Good quickness and steals. Solid jumpshot, perimter defense and jumping. |
|
|
|
Post by Jayda on Mar 14, 2024 8:48:39 GMT -8
I think there is just a more probability players bust and GMs dont like it. Or they are taking longer than before to develop. So the turn around to winning is not as quick.
|
|
|
|
Post by chipper on Mar 14, 2024 8:49:03 GMT -8
I think there is just a more probability players bust and GMs dont like it. Or they are taking longer than before to develop. So the turn around to winning is not as quick. yeah this sums it up I think. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 14, 2024 9:01:20 GMT -8
I think there is just a more probability players bust and GMs dont like it. Or they are taking longer than before to develop. So the turn around to winning is not as quick. I understand why people are complaining. But if were gonna deal with inflation without removing rewards ratings need to be lower. There are only so many options. |
|
|
|
Post by Jayda on Mar 14, 2024 9:02:19 GMT -8
I think there is just a more probability players bust and GMs dont like it. Or they are taking longer than before to develop. So the turn around to winning is not as quick. I understand why people are complaining. But if were gonna deal with inflation without removing rewards ratings need to be lower. There are only so many options. I dont mind the ratings, people gotta figure it out its your league run it how you seem fit. |
|
|
|
Post by lumley316 on Mar 14, 2024 9:09:20 GMT -8
Smush Parker PG 6'4'' 190 23 C+ C C+ B- C- B think his notes were forgotten Notes his sister is Candace Parker |
|
