|
Post by Spencer on Apr 17, 2024 9:16:48 GMT -8
The Contract Year
1. If you go 4 years without winning 42 games or making the playoffs you will enter your Contract Year. If you fail to make the playoffs or win 42 in the fourth season, you will be fired.
2. You may return to the WL after being fired.
I had a convo with a respected GM and we discussed making the CY a little larger. I decided to go with a 4 year window.
Best of luck!
|
|
habes
New Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,726
|
Post by habes on Apr 17, 2024 9:17:25 GMT -8
1. If you go 4 years without winning 42 games or making the playoffs you will enter your Contract Year. If you fail to make the playoffs or win 42 in the fifth season, you will be fired.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2024 9:18:42 GMT -8
Lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2024 9:19:02 GMT -8
Great timing!
|
|
|
Post by zinger on Apr 17, 2024 9:23:10 GMT -8
Name the respected gm. Want to see who you respect here
|
|
|
Post by zinger on Apr 17, 2024 9:23:16 GMT -8
Was it marty
|
|
|
Post by zinger on Apr 17, 2024 9:23:24 GMT -8
Or lumley
|
|
|
Post by zinger on Apr 17, 2024 9:23:38 GMT -8
Or royal
|
|
habes
New Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,726
|
Post by habes on Apr 17, 2024 9:26:32 GMT -8
i'd love to know the respected GM's argument for why you need four seasons before you can win 42 games. we're doing the CY right now and the usual suspects are in it (all due love and respect to both of these men), so idk what we expect to change about a five-year window other than allowing good GMs to tank longer.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 17, 2024 9:30:02 GMT -8
i'd love to know the respected GM's argument for why you need four seasons before you can win 42 games. we're doing the CY right now and the usual suspects are in it (all due love and respect to both of these men), so idk what we expect to change about a five-year window other than allowing good GMs to tank longer. I think 3 years is a solid window. I didn't think it needed editing. But I heard some argument for a bigger window, most notably the draft classes being worse. Also like the group of Gms and our WL isn't outstanding so I see no harm. Only teams would've been in the CY next year and neither of them were the Gm I talked to.
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Apr 17, 2024 9:30:41 GMT -8
who is this fool
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2024 9:31:51 GMT -8
But implementing the extension when two gms are in Cy is wild
|
|
|
Post by Ding Dong Boys on Apr 17, 2024 9:33:23 GMT -8
sometimes you get CY'd. What can you do....happens to the best of us!
|
|
|
Post by Ding Dong Boys on Apr 17, 2024 9:33:30 GMT -8
my team is horny for trades
|
|
|
Post by zinger on Apr 17, 2024 9:33:46 GMT -8
NAME THIS MYSTERY PERSON
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 17, 2024 9:33:51 GMT -8
The CY hasnt even really started. If we had already started the first cycle I wouldnt have done this.
|
|
habes
New Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,726
|
Post by habes on Apr 17, 2024 9:33:55 GMT -8
i'd love to know the respected GM's argument for why you need four seasons before you can win 42 games. we're doing the CY right now and the usual suspects are in it (all due love and respect to both of these men), so idk what we expect to change about a five-year window other than allowing good GMs to tank longer. I think 3 years is a solid window. I didn't think it needed editing. But I heard some argument for a bigger window, most notably the draft classes being worse. Also like the group of Gms and our WL isn't outstanding so I see no harm. Only teams would've been in the CY next year and neither of them were the Gm I talked to. sour grapes from guys who dealt their youth too soon
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 17, 2024 9:34:04 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Break on Apr 17, 2024 9:34:09 GMT -8
Well we all know who it wasn’t lol
|
|
habes
New Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,726
|
Post by habes on Apr 17, 2024 9:34:22 GMT -8
But it’s all good idc. If you need five years enjoy them. My daughter turns five on Monday
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 17, 2024 9:34:47 GMT -8
Well we all know who it wasn’t lol Aaron is just doing the misdirection! It was Aaron!
|
|
|
Post by zinger on Apr 17, 2024 9:34:52 GMT -8
I know it’s not LB, but With all due respect, fuck Lb
|
|
|
Post by Break on Apr 17, 2024 9:35:35 GMT -8
Well we all know who it wasn’t lol Aaron is just doing the misdirection! It was Aaron! I meant me! Lmao
|
|
|
Post by zinger on Apr 17, 2024 9:35:54 GMT -8
This was broph wasn’t it? Swear I saw him post about it. Also, I don’t care either way. I’m fine with whatever!
|
|
|
Post by zinger on Apr 17, 2024 9:36:05 GMT -8
Give me an ac for guessing correctly
|
|
|
Post by Break on Apr 17, 2024 9:36:39 GMT -8
Just end cy
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Apr 17, 2024 9:37:03 GMT -8
cry babies
|
|
|
Post by chipper on Apr 17, 2024 9:37:26 GMT -8
! I’VE BEEN SAVED BY A MYSTERIOUS STRANGER!
|
|
habes
New Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,726
|
Post by habes on Apr 17, 2024 9:38:18 GMT -8
Give me an ac for guessing correctly if you're right i'll eat my shoe (figure of speech)
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Apr 17, 2024 9:39:05 GMT -8
It does sound like broph tbh
|
|